Rape Culture Among Nigerian Youth: When Sexual Violence Becomes Entertainment

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A video that circulated widely on social media in early October 2026 has once again thrown a harsh light on rape culture among Nigerian youth and the growing normalization of non-consensual recording and sharing of sexual assaults.

Delta State Police Public Relations Officer SP Bright Edafe confirmed the arrest of one of the main suspects in the case a 16-year-old identified as Godstime after footage emerged showing underage boys in a hotel around Ughelli mocking a 16-year-old girl over her menstrual period following an alleged sexual assault. All parties involved are under 18.

According to the girl’s account given during the  police interview, she was invited to the hotel by a friend. She alleged that two boys, Godstime and Goodluck, both also 16, assaulted her, recorded the incident, and later mocked her for being on her period. Godstime, who has admitted participating in the acts and recording the video, claimed they did so because they were angry when she told them she was menstruating. He disputed the number of times the assault occurred. Edafe stated the arrested suspect would face prosecution.

What made the case particularly disturbing for many observers was not only the alleged assault itself, but the decision to record and circulate a video that turned the girl’s trauma into content for mockery. The viral clip showed the boys treating the situation as something to be shared and laughed about, rather than a serious violation of another young person’s bodily autonomy and dignity.

This pattern is not isolated. Across Nigeria, activists and researchers like the Rising Child Foundation have documented a rise in image-based sexual abuse, the non-consensual creation, recording, or distribution of intimate or sexual images and videos. Young people, particularly girls and young women, frequently face digital humiliation when private or non-consensual footage is shared on WhatsApp, social media, or messaging groups for entertainment, revenge, status, or peer validation.

In many of these cases, the act of recording and sharing becomes an extension of the violence itself. It multiplies the harm by exposing the survivor to ongoing public shame, secondary trauma, and social stigma long after the original incident. The Ughelli video fits this pattern; the recording was used not merely as evidence of the acts but as a tool to further degrade the girl over a natural bodily process.

Feminist observers point out that such behaviour is often minimised with the familiar refrain of “boys will be boys.” The familiar excuse that “boys will be boys” can further weaken accountability when it is used to dismiss harmful conduct as a natural part of growing up.

When young males treat sexual violence or the humiliation of girls as content or a joke, it reflects deeper attitudes of entitlement, lack of respect for consent, and the belief that female bodies exist for male entertainment or control. Boys should not be taught that dominance, sexual conquest or the humiliation of girls demonstrates strength. They should instead be encouraged to understand responsibility, empathy and respect as essential parts of growing up.

This culture is reinforced by weak accountability.   While Nigeria has laws addressing cybercrimes and the non-consensual distribution of intimate images (including provisions under the Cybercrimes Act), enforcement remains inconsistent. Victim-blaming remains widespread, with questions frequently directed at the girl (“What was she doing in the hotel?”) rather than at the boys who allegedly violated her and recorded it, or at the adults and systems that allowed underage youths unrestricted access to a hotel room.  Being invited to a hotel does not constitute consent to sexual activity. 

Neither does a friendship, a relationship or any previous sexual encounter. Consent must be freely given, and it can be withdrawn.Similarly, menstruation does not justify sexual violence, ridicule or degrading treatment. A person’s bodily functions are not grounds for humiliation, and no circumstance makes non-consensual sexual activity acceptable.

Victim-blaming can discourage survivors from reporting abuse because they may fear being disbelieved, judged or held responsible for what happened to them. It can also shift public attention away from the conduct of those accused of causing harm.

Addressing this requires more than individual arrests. Comprehensive sexuality education that centres consent, respect, and the consequences of digital actions is urgently needed in schools and communities. Young people must be taught that recording and sharing non-consensual sexual content is itself a form of violence, not a joke or a flex.

 Stronger accountability is also essential for perpetrators, for those who share such material, and for institutions (including hotels) that enable situations where minors can be placed at risk. Cultural rejection of the idea that boys’ harmful behaviour should be excused because of their age or gender is long overdue.

The Ughelli case is a painful reminder that when sexual violence is treated as entertainment among youth, the harm extends far beyond the original act.